Factors affecting hand tremor and postural sway in children

<p><b>OBJECTIVES</b>It is crucial to consider covariates relevant for outcome variables in developing dose-effect relations of environmental hazardous toxins. The aim of this study was to clarify the covariates affecting hand tremor and postural sway in children.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Hand tremor and postural sway, as well as hair mercury concentrations, were measured in 155 boys and 148 girls at age 7 years.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Current mercury concentrations in child hair ranged from 0.35 to 6.32 μg/g (geometric mean, 1.71 μg/g for boys and 1.58 μg/g for girls), and were not significantly correlated with the neuromotor parameters. All hand tremor and postural sway parameters, except for tremor intensity at 1-6 Hz with non-dominant hand, were significantly larger in the boys than in the girls. Using multiple regression analysis, some postural sway parameters were related negatively to age in the boys and girls (p<0.05), and positively to height (p<0.05). Similarly, hand tremor parameters were positively related to age, height and heart rate either in the boys or in the girls (p<0.05). Also, there were positive relationships between tremor intensity at 1-6 Hz and transversal and sagittal sways at 1-2 Hz and 2-4 Hz (p<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Heart rate and postural sway, together with age, sex, and height, should be considered in interpreting hand tremor in children. Hand tremor or postural sway may not be so sensitive or specific to methylmercury exposures at levels of less than 7 μg/g in hair.</p>

Factors Affecting Hand Tremor and Postural Sway in Children

Objectives: It is crucial to consider covariates relevant for outcome variables in developing dose-effect relations of environmental hazardous toxins. The aim of this study was to clarify the covariates affecting hand tremor and postural sway in children. Methods: Hand tremor and postural sway, as well as hair mercury concentrations, were measured in 155 boys and 148 girls at age 7 years. Results: Current mercury concentrations in child hair ranged from 0.35 to 6.32 μg/g (geometric mean, 1.71 μg/g for boys and 1.58 μg/g for girls), and were not significantly correlated with the neuromotor parameters. All hand tremor and postural sway parameters, except for tremor intensity at 1–6 Hz with non-dominant hand, were significantly larger in the boys than in the girls. Using multiple regression analysis, some postural sway parameters were related negatively to age in the boys and girls (p<0.05), and positively to height (p<0.05). Similarly, hand tremor parameters were positively related to age, height and heart rate either in the boys or in the girls (p<0.05). Also, there were positive relationships between tremor intensity at 1–6 Hz and transversal and sagittal sways at 1–2 Hz and 2–4 Hz (p<0.05). Conclusions: Heart rate and postural sway, together with age, sex, and height, should be considered in interpreting hand tremor in children. Hand tremor or postural sway may not be so sensitive or specific to methylmercury exposures at levels of less than 7 μg/g in hair.

Effects of hair treatment on hair mercury-The best biomarker of methylmercury exposure?

<p><b>OBJECTIVES</b>Exposure misclassification is a major obstacle to obtain accurate dose-response relationships. In order to solve this problem, the impact of hair treatment on total mercury in hair was assessed in Japanese women.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A cross-sectional study was carried out among 327 women at age 24-49 years to determine hair mercury levels and estimate daily mercury intakes from seafood by using a food frequency questionnaire.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Hair mercury levels in the women and daily mercury intake ranged from 0.11 to 6.86 (median 1.63) μg/g and from 0.77 to 144.9 (median 15.0) μg/day, respectively. The hair mercury was positively correlated with the daily mercury intake (p<0.001). When the women were divided into two subgroups based on artificial hair-waving, hair coloring/dyeing, residence (non-fishing and fishing areas), and working status, a significant difference in the hair mercury level was observed between the women with and without artificial hair-waving only (p<0.001). The multiple regression analysis showed that the log-transformed hair mercury level was significantly related to the log-transformed daily mercury intake (standardized regression coefficient βs=0.307) and artificial hair-waving (βs=-0.276); but not to hair coloring/dyeing, residence, working status or age. Permanent hair treatment was estimated to reduce total mercury in hair by approximately 30%, after adjusting for daily mercury intake and other possible factors.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>These findings suggest that hair mercury is not the best biomarker of methylmercury exposure when a study population includes women with artificial hair-waving.</p>

Effects of Hair Treatment on Hair Mercury---The Best Biomarker of Methylmercury Exposure?

Objectives: Exposure misclassification is a major obstacle to obtain accurate dose-response relationships. In order to solve this problem, the impact of hair treatment on total mercury in hair was assessed in Japanese women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 327 women at age 24-49 years to determine hair mercury levels and estimate daily mercury intakes from seafood by using a food frequency questionnaire. Results: Hair mercury levels in the women and daily mercury intake ranged from 0.11 to 6.86 (median 1.63) μg/g and from 0.77 to 144.9 (median 15.0) μg/day, respectively. The hair mercury was positively correlated with the daily mercury intake (p<0.001). When the women were divided into two subgroups based on artificial hair-waving, hair coloring/dyeing, residence (non-fishing and fishing areas), and working status, a significant difference in the hair mercury level was observed between the women with and without artificial hair-waving only (p<0.001). The multiple regression analysis showed that the log-transformed hair mercury level was significantly related to the log-transformed daily mercury intake (standardized regression coefficient βs=0.307) and artificial hair-waving (βs=−0.276); but not to hair coloring/dyeing, residence, working status or age. Permanent hair treatment was estimated to reduce total mercury in hair by approximately 30%, after adjusting for daily mercury intake and other possible factors. Conclusions: These findings suggest that hair mercury is not the best biomarker of methylmercury exposure when a study population includes women with artificial hair-waving.